Choose Covidence if…
- Your institution already pays for Covidence and your team is trained on it.
- You need a mature dual-screening workflow with minimal AI automation.
- Your review group standardises on Covidence for audit trails.
Covidence is built for structured dual screening teams. Meta-analysis360 adds AI protocol drafting, search strings, and confidence-gated screening in one workspace — with you keeping every final decision.
Covidence® is a trademark of its respective owner. Meta-analysis360 is an independent product and is not endorsed by or affiliated with Covidence.
Side by side
Honest snapshot for researchers comparing screening tools. Features change — verify on each vendor's site before you decide.
FAQ
Partially. Both support systematic review screening and team workflows. Covidence is widely used in institutional settings for structured dual review. Meta-analysis360 focuses on AI-assisted planning, search, and screening with human final decisions. We are not affiliated with Covidence.
Yes. Meta-analysis360 supports team members, blinded screening, and conflict visibility when blind mode is off.
Yes. Planning, protocol, and search strategy tabs come before screening — Covidence typically expects you to arrive with references ready.
Yes. Import RIS, BibTeX, NBIB, and EndNote exports, then deduplicate before AI or manual screening.
Open the live agent demo or sign in to run AI-assisted screening on your own library.